Which of the following describes a legal cause of action due to improper training?

Negligent Training is a legal cause of action that arises when an employer or organization fails to properly train its employees, leading to harm or damage as a result of that inadequate training. In the context of legal liability, if it can be demonstrated that the training provided was insufficient or flawed, and that this directly contributed to an incident or injury, then the organization may be found liable for negligence.

For example, if an employer does not equip employees with the necessary skills or knowledge to perform their jobs safely, and an accident occurs as a result of this lack of training, the injured party may have grounds to sue for negligent training. The legal standard often reflects an expectation that organizations will provide adequate training to prevent foreseeable risks associated with employee performance.

In contrast, the other options—disparate impact, administrative oversight, and inadequate resources—while they can relate to workplace issues, they do not specifically establish a legal basis for action due to improper training. Disparate impact deals with employment discrimination effects, administrative oversight pertains to failures in management processes, and inadequate resources reference a lack of funding or tools needed to fulfill duties, but they don't directly establish a legal cause stemming specifically from the quality or sufficiency of training.